|
LEGISLATIVE NEWS
Castle Doctrine” Self-Defense Bill to be Considered in Pennsylvania Next Week! Monday, November 09, 2009
Please Contact the Members of the House Judiciary Committee Today! On Thursday, November 19, the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee will consider
House Bill 40.
HB40, sponsored by State Representative Scott Perry (R-92), would permit law-abiding
citizens to use force, including deadly force, against an attacker in their homes and any places outside of their home where
they have a legal right to be. It is clearly stated that there would be no “duty to retreat” from an attacker,
allowing law-abiding citizens to stand their ground to protect themselves and their family. HB40 would also protect
individuals from civil lawsuits by the attacker or the attacker’s family when force is used.
If you would like to testify, please contact
the House Judiciary Committee at (717) 787-3525.
Please contact the members of the House Judiciary
Committee TODAY and respectfully urge them to support HB40. Contact information can be found below.
State Representative Thomas
R. Caltagirone (D-127) (717) 787-3525
State Representative Deberah Kula (D-52) (717) 772-1858
State Representative Kathy Manderino (D-194) (717)
787-1254
State
Representative John E. Pallone (D-54) (717) 783-1819 State Representative Don Walko (D-20) (717) 787-5470
State Representative Joseph F. Brennan (D-133) (717)
772-9902
State
Representative James E. Casorio Jr. (D-56) (717) 783-3483 State Representative Paul J. Drucker (D-157) (717) 705-2003
State
Representative Bryan R. Lentz (D-161) (717) 787-8574
Lancaster New Era Oct 06, 2009 08:51 EST TO THE EDITORS: Your article, "Akron mayor resents being target of NRA" (9/19), contains
some bogus claims that warrant a response. We appreciate Mayor John McBeth publicly resigning from Mayors Against Illegal
Guns. However, Mayor McBeth is ill-informed to believe that MAIG has "no objection whatsoever to a legal gun owner."
MAIG opposed the Thune Amendment, which would have allowed concealed carry permit holders a chance to defend themselves
outside their home states. If MAIG is only going after "illegal guns," then why is it opposed to a self-defense
measure for law-abiding people who have been through background checks and satisfied other law-enforcement prerequisites to
get their right-to-carry permits? There is nothing "illegal" about the firearms these people own. MAIG would also
like to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, a move that the Fraternal Order of Police opposes because it would allow sensitive firearms
trace information to be made public - even to criminals.
The Intelligencer Journal /Lancaster New Era negligently
published a story that questions the NRA's solution to the problem of "illegal guns" without calling and asking
us.
Our position is clear: To reduce crime, we must enforce the more than 20,000 gun laws already on the books
and mandate the harshest possible punishments for criminals who misuse guns. Alexa Fritts Media
Liaison
National Rifle Association
Institute for
Legislative Action
Fairfax, Va.
| Pennsylvania: Bethlehem Area School District Eliminates Funding
for Two High School Rifle Teams! | | | | Tuesday, August 18, 2009 | | | Please Stand-Up and Make Your Voices Heard!
Due
to tightening budgets, the Bethlehem Area School District has shut off funding for the Liberty High School and Freedom High
School rifle teams. Both teams have been in existence for over 40 years and have consistently been given
grants by NRA.
Unfortunately, the Bethlehem Area School District is choosing
to balance the budget on the backs of tomorrow’s shooters. Rifle teams, such as these, help foster
the future of our Second Amendment freedoms, shooting sports, and safe firearms training.
Please contact the Superintendent of
Schools, Dr. Joseph A. Lewis, and the members of the school board TODAY and respectfully voice your disapproval
with their action. Contact information can be found
below.
Dr. Joseph A. Lewis, Superintendent of Schools Phone:
(610) 861-0500, ext. 60250 Fax: (610) 807-5599 supt@bethsd.org
Board of School Directors:
(610) 861-0500
Officers:
Loretta M. Leeson, President lleeson@rcn.com
Judith A. Dexter, Vice President
ja.dexter@verizon.net
Stanley J. Majewski, Jr., Secretary smajewski@beth.k12.pa.us
Anne Morton, Treasurer amorton@beth.k12.pa.us
Members: Rosario S. Amato ramato@rcn.com
Michele Cann mcann@rcn.com
Irene Follweiler ifollweiler@rcn.com
Craig T. Haytmanek chaytmanek@rcn.com
Charlene A. Koch ckoch@rcn.com
Eugene C. McKeon e.mckeon@rcn.com
Benjamin M. Tenaglia, III btenaglia@rcn.com
|
|
|
|  | Copyright 2009, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action. This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes. 11250 Waples Mill Road, Fairfax, VA 22030
800-392-8683 Contact Us | Privacy & Security Policy |
Recently, demanding a harsh new federal ban on semi-automatic firearms,
Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell evoked the defining argument of the gun-ban movement--their twisted confusion between good
and evil. “It’s nuts for ordinary citizens to go out and buy assault weapons. Assault weapons
are difficult to operate, they jam easily. If you want a gun to protect your home, it’s the last thing you should have.
... If you have an assault weapon to protect your house, you’re crazy ... they’re not very effective.” So much for possession of a firearm on the side of good. What about evil? In the hands
of criminals, Rendell said, “Assault weapons only have one purpose ... They fire at short range; they put out a ton
of fire at one time; and they are very powerful ... There’s no purpose for these guns but to kill or maim.” All this double talk was said in virtually the same breath. But Rendell’s convoluted
notion of good and evil is the very core of why the gun ban movement defies common sense. It rejects the most important instinct
of humanity--self-preservation against evil. Human beings have a hard-wired program for self-protection;
for fighting back; for safeguarding their homes, families and communities. As Americans, that’s why we preserve armed
self-defense as part of our Second Amendment protections. There is a single reason the “business model” works. It is the same reason “gun control”
provides an overwhelming advantage to armed criminals. Their unarmed victims can’t fight back. |
Rendell’s rant was amplified by ABC’s 20/20 special, “If Only I Had a Gun”--a shameless
hit-job, totally embracing the gun-ban belief system that armed self defense in the face of evil--a mass murderer in a public
setting--is futile. (Click here to read NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox’s insightful analysis, “20/20 Turns A Blind Eye on
Self Defense.” ) That same embrace of evil over good was pressed home by an aggressively pacifist media on an international
scale with coverage of Somali piracy and terrorism on the high seas. In the past year alone, Somali pirates,
heavily armed with full-automatic firearms and rocket propelled grenades (RPGs), have attacked over 100 commercial vessels
and extracted tribute to the tune of over $100 million. In an April 10 puff-piece, The New York Times called the pirates “professional,”
quoting an “expert” saying the pirates have “a business model that has proven very effective for them.” There is a single reason the “business model” works. It is the same reason “gun control”
provides an overwhelming advantage to armed criminals. Their unarmed victims can’t fight back. As
most Americans proudly know, the pirate “business model” was wrecked when high-seas thugs attempted to capture
an American-flagged ship, the Maersk Alabama--the first U.S. vessel seized in an act of piracy since 1801. The
American crew valiantly fought back and maintained control of their ship. U.S. Navy SEAL snipers aboard the destroyer USS
Bainbridge killed three Somali pirates as one was about to murder the ship’s captain who had bravely traded his freedom
for the safety of his crew. Even that intervention using deadly force to save Captain Richard Phillips
was attacked as a provocation. The Christian Science Monitor quoted a maritime expert: “We
fear that this escalation spiral, which we’ve seen in the past few months, will push the pirates into a readiness to
shoot ... .” Most importantly, the Maersk Alabama incident sparked a controversy over something
that should be a no-brainer--arming crews. “Do we really want private industry taking law and order
into their own hands on the high seas? ... private shipping companies could find themselves in an escalating arms race with
pirates.” That’s from a managing director of a London shipping concern who was quoted in
a Houston Chronicle article that also quoted marine engineers--the Americans who maintain their ships--as wanting small arms
as the means for self-defense. On the side of reason at a recent Senate hearing was Capt. Phillips, who
advocated handing out arms to specially trained officers in times of pirate assault. Also coming out
four-square on the side of using armed guards on merchant ships was Gen. David Petraeus, who now heads the U.S. Central Command,
that includes military operations in Africa. What about real time experience? About the time of the Maersk
Alabama ordeal, the MCS Melody with 1,500 passengers aboard was attacked. The ship’s master, Carlos Pinto, described
the scene, “They were firing like crazy ... they tried to put up a ladder with hooks ... pistols were handed out ...
we started firing, they gave up and went off.” Yet Reuters reported a maritime official saying,
“Although the ship’s action may have saved the Melody from capture, it only endangered the lives of passengers.” Sound familiar? Like guns in the home? It’s the same old big lie we’ve heard repeatedly about the
Second Amendment. The gun-ban crowd would impose a tyrannical doctrine that goes against every human
instinct for survival. That policy guarantees not free individuals choosing self-defense against evil, but the triumph of
evil over disarmed victims. 
Posted: 7/1/2009 3:31:04 PM
Pennsylvania: Lancaster Passes Illegal Anti-Gun Ordinance Wednesday, June 10, 2009 Please Stand-Up and Make Your Voices Heard! Yesterday, the Lancaster City Council unanimously passed a proposal introduced by Mayor Richard Gray (D) that would require
gun owners to report a lost or stolen firearm within a 72-hour period or face fines and possible imprisonment. This
law not only violates Pennsylvania’s state preemption laws, but it could make law-abiding victims into criminals for
failing to report a lost or stolen firearm within 72-hours.
According to the news report on
LancasterOnline.com, the Mayor has said the Brady Center to Prevent Gun
Violence will provide free legal counsel if lawsuits are levied on the city. Please contact the members of the City Council and Mayor Gray TODAY and respectfully voice your disapproval with their passage of this illegal and
unwarranted attack on law-abiding gun owners. The City Council can be
reached by phone at (717) 291-4785. Email addresses for the City Council can be found
below. Mayor Gray can be contacted by phone at (717) 291-4701 or e-mail mayorsoffice@cityoflancasterpa.com.
Louise B. Williams,
President LBWilliams1@aol.com
Patricia A. Coller pacoller@live.com
Joseph R. Morales joemorales.sr@verizon.net
Nelson M. Polite, Sr., Vice-President Politesr14@aol.com
Tim J. Roschel Troschel@aol.com
Kendra J. Saunders Kendrajeansaunders@yahoo.com Jose E. Urdaneta Jurdaneta@urdaneta.net
| Pennsylvania’s
Hunting Heritage is in Jeopardy! | | | | Tuesday, May
05, 2009 | | | Please
Contact the Senate and House Judiciary Committees Today! Animal “rights”
extremists are at it again and looking to dissolve Pennsylvania’s rich hunting heritage. Two bills,
Senate Bill 843 and House Bill 1411, have been introduced and assigned to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees.
Simply
put, these bills would criminalize and ban organized bird shoots in Pennsylvania
by amending Title 18 ("Crimes and Offenses") of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes.
Pigeon shooting
is an historic and legitimate activity steeped in tradition with many participants throughout the Commonwealth and around
the world. For over one hundred years, shoots have been held in Pennsylvania by law-abiding, ethical shooting enthusiasts,
hunters, and sportsmen who would not tolerate an activity that would constitute cruelty to animals. National “animal rights” extremist groups, led by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), have
organized and funded efforts in Pennsylvania and around the country to ban this longstanding traditional shooting sport.
Make no mistake; this isn't just about banning pigeon shooting, but banning all hunting species by species.
Please contact the members of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees and the bills’ sponsors and respectfully
urge them to oppose SB843 and HB1411. Contact information for the Senate Judiciary Committee can
be found here. Please click here for contact information for the House Judiciary Committee. |
|
|
|  |
If you think that our second
amendment rights are safe and secure with the recent Supreme Court decision, guess again. There is an aggressive movement across the
country to tax your ammunition that will make it too expensive to shoot. You can see the actual House bill that was
proposed in Pennsylvania by clicking HERE Fortunately, this bill died in committee.
For
information on legislation in other states, you can find it by going directly through the organization's own website.
www.ammunitionaccountability.org
| NRA Hunters Rights |

|
|